Federal Judge Says E-mail Not Protected By 4th Amendment
DustyShadow writes "In the case In re United States, Judge Mosman ruled that there is no constitutional requirement of notice to the account holder because the Fourth Amendment does not apply to e-mails under the third-party doctrine. 'When a person uses the Internet, the user's actions are no longer in his or her physical home; in fact he or she is not truly acting in private space at all. The user is generally accessing the Internet with a network account and computer storage owned by an ISP like Comcast or NetZero. All materials stored online, whether they are e-mails or remotely stored documents, are physically stored on servers owned by an ISP. When we send an e-mail or instant message from the comfort of our own homes to a friend across town the message travels from our computer to computers owned by a third party, the ISP, before being delivered to the intended recipient. Thus, “private” information is actually being held by third-party private companies.""
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
MegaPlatinum.net - Your Rock, Punk, and Metal Community. Band Profiles. Forums. Label. Distro. Punk Vinyl. Rock Vinyl. Management. Career Development. A&R. Motto:Tough To Destroy!
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. Comments are property of their posters, all the rest are copyright by MegaPlatinum.net - Your Rock, Punk, and Metal Community. Band Profiles. Forums. Label. Distro. Punk Vinyl. Rock Vinyl. Management. Career Development. A&R. Motto:Tough To Destroy!